| The US military have a WAY too big budget... | |
|
Jacen Aratan - Student |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4174519.stm o_O |
| Login and add your comment! |
| Comments |
|
Raziel Anjelis - Student 
|
ok the flatulence? Thatd make them laugh! _______________ Proud owner of El Vee For's 200th Comment, and Wicek's 2600th comment  DaMi3N's 400th, Trad Redav's 666th.
|
|
Mic Den Octela - Student 
|
Creepy, yet... no.... just creepy o.O _______________ -Padawan of Virtue -Brother of Menaxia, *|irael, Krynn Adept, Majno, Ris Win Juljul, DaMi3N, Beowulf, Dash Starlight, Carrock and Yuken Zalak Bartender at Munes bar. Sir Mic of Nippledom! Proudly beating Wang, since '07. (Crackdown) |
|
JavaGuy - Student 
|
C3P0: The great Jabba asks why he must pay 50,000. Bounty Hunter: [Jabbers in his own language and pulls out small round object.] C3P0: Because he's holding the gay sex bomb! _______________ My signature is only one line. You're welcome. |
|
Ashyr - Student 
|
Yeah, I honestly doubt they spent 7.5mil just coming up with these ideas. Sounds like a load of BS to me. _______________ Top ten reasons to get a better computer...|My fan |
|
JavaGuy - Student
|
I'm pretty sure pheremoned perfumes are a scam. Years ago they became very popular, but double-blind tests (similar smelling perfumes with and without pheremones, the subject not knowing which he was wearing) show no difference. They work great on rats and squirrels, but human sexuality turns out to be a lot more complex. Now maybe they've improved since then. You can certainly read lots of testimonials about how great they are. But testimonials mean squat. Show me a double-blind experiment. _______________ My signature is only one line. You're welcome. |
|
Kueller - Student 
|
Javaguy, we're closer to making men very attractive to women then you think. Think of pheromones, the only problem now is finding a universal one. Although some scents do work on a big majority of the males/females in the population. Hence the sometimes great effect of Axe for example  _______________ Personal sleepness-nights-supporter of Virtue. Owner of the 1000th comment of Daidalus and 1943th comment of Gradius! Owner of the 300th comment of Carda! -Taught Gradius all his laming skills 
|
|
JavaGuy - Student
|
Quote: It would give the enemy severe bad breath so that if they try to slip away into the civilian population they could still be identified. Where I live they'd blend right in. Actually the "gay bomb" is not such a bad idea in terms of psychological warfare. Anything that radically changes the dynamic of how a group of soldiers interact with one another is going to disrupt the unit's fighting effectiveness. It's not that a gay soldier is any less effective, just that it introduces a sudden, radical change in the soldiers' lifestyle when they've got enough on their plates already trying to fight a war. The problem with the idea is that it is scientifically implausible. People have been trying for thousands of years to discover any kind of an aphrodesiac--the existence of the pickup-lines thread on this very forum demonstrates our utter failure to find one. If we found a way to make men irresistible to men, we'd be at least close to finding a way to make men irresistible to women, and the truth is we're nowhere near close to that. _______________ My signature is only one line. You're welcome. |
|
Buzz - Student 
|
Funny how they gave that idea an entire article but left out the other reports. One of them I actually thought was a good idea. The Bad Breath Bomb. It would give the enemy severe bad breath so that if they try to slip away into the civilian population they could still be identified. Seems kind of silly but it also seems like a reasonable idea. _______________ When you are going through Hell, keep going. -Sir Winston Churchill. Those who seek power and control of others, no matter the level, no matter the intentions, should never be given it. |
|
JavaGuy - Student
|
It looks like they actually did conduct some research in this area...  _______________ My signature is only one line. You're welcome. |
|
JavaGuy - Student 
|
Uh, Dice, nobody disputes that. The point is that somebody in the taxpayer's dime spent some time giving this serious consideration. LOL. _______________ My signature is only one line. You're welcome. |
|
Dicemaster - Student 
|
you ppl need to read better. It says, and i quote "Captain Dan McSweeney of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate at the Pentagon said the defence department receives "literally hundreds" of project ideas, but that "none of the systems described in that [1994] proposal have been developed". He told the BBC: "It's important to point out that only those proposals which are deemed appropriate, based on stringent human effects, legal, and international treaty reviews are considered for development or acquisition." " meaning that this was someones stupid idea that never got followed up on -Dice _______________ Dicemaster |
|
JavaGuy - Student
|
This brings to an end the false dichotomy of "Make love, not war." It doesn't have to be one or the other. This would make great fodder for an Enemy Territory mod. On the Seawall Battery map, in particular, it would give new meaning to infiltrating the rear entrance. _______________ My signature is only one line. You're welcome. |
|
Cheta T. Must - Student 
|
... there's pretty much not alot to say about a "gay bomb". except.. WTF!!!!!!1111 make the enemy love eachother that plan sux!!!. and i jsut read more 7.5mil for THAT!!! dude i could of used that money better. This comment was edited by Cheta T. Must on Jan 17 2005 12:16am. |
| Login and add your comment! |